September 24, 2015

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

Washington D.C. 20500

Barry,     

      My dear fellow, not to be presumptuous in my familiarity but I have been writing these letters for six full years now and thus believe formalities ought to be set aside. So Barry it is, unless you object.

      But having come to a first name basis (you may call me Lynn) I want to assure you decorum shall be observed. A prudent caution requires a mature intellect such as yours be critiqued in the same terms. I would never dare to challenge your sanity in allowing the mullahs to take terror to a nuclear level, nor in flooding them with cash to finance their efforts. Or in doing this, your partnering with a Senate more suited to sexual partnering with toddlers, a Senate that may positively gush with excitement at the thought of our overseas alliance with a culture in which chaining a little boy to a bed so he cannot run away when his captor wants to rape him (or her?) is normative, just another life style choice and, perhaps overcome by a stupor of the erotic, remain passively mute when our soldiers are castigated and attempts are made to forcibly discharge one of them from service for giving way to the natural sentiments and rescuing the child (those war fighters are fouling our entertainment, the good senators might say); nor do I question your recreant indifference to the hundreds of young girls kidnaped in Nigeria, when you refused to give up information that would have helped set them free unless that country bowed to what is now an American foreign policy demand of the world to accept the LGBT agenda (Stella Morabito, 15 Reasons..., 6/26/15, The Federalist). Far be it from me to question the compassion of homosexuals—and the feminists who support them—when these girls are raped daily for their benefit. They are surely misunderstood, perhaps raping children is misunderstood, or maybe feminists (or the Court) will declare them “not real women.” Pray enlighten us.

      Now propriety has been observed as promised. Manliness having been replaced by sensitivity leaves me little choice. Bruised sentiments would only bear the odious fruit of progressives incessant whining, and we have all endured enough of that.

      Nevertheless, the dishonest media, which is often just gay men and women talking to each other, represents progressives and so, gladly bombards the public with their opinions and views daily. Let me dare to offer my unfiltered thoughts, for just a few sentences, from NOTHI SEAUTON.

Understanding truth as a threat to the state’s imperious march to power media progressives beat it down or edit it out while portraying those of the left as oh-so-gaily beneficent and tolerant. Yet if that were true they would not have to hide from telling us why they and their homosexual terrorist allies harbor such militant enmity for India and cultures like it, and how those same homosexuals appropriated United States government assets to deliberately engage in dastardly, malevolent and mortifying sectarian violence (a dirty war of terror) against that sovereign nation’s culture and appointed representative:

Ahh, to be able to grasp from a distance by proxy of law a human and by eminence of government to eliminate all their hope, to reach out and force oneself on them, to humiliate, to terrify, to violate she who is at their mercy by putting their very hands on her in order to warm and firm their loins with her fearful trembling, secure in the knowledge this violation of, this chipping away at her soul is unstoppable by law, protected by the state, that they are utterly in control, they own her. This is pure joy tinctured sexual for these gay perpetrators. And that cringe of horror at this defilement that her sternest discipline cannot quite control? Well, wonderful they crow, this will be interpreted by their toady’s as resistance, as an excuse to force her to endure the further wretched touch of their filthy hands; hence, the fear, the shame, the breaking anguish, Yes! That is pain they can live on even from a distance, puts a spring in a psychopaths step, firms the phallus, sets the nethers a tingle, and make’s life worth living! This is the totalitarian way. Stand up people and let everyone see what gay tolerance and your ballyhooed esteem for cultural diversity, really, looks like.

      Institutional decay is an ingravescent fact. Where once we at least paid lip service to the belief that persons ought to be equally free and thus had a hope of being treated equally, liberty is now taken as license for hedonism and equality as license for government to dissolve the boundaries of our lives and institutions with its leveling directives. Hence, seemingly endless rights, disjoined from practical reason, are claimed by force of and dispensed by government, willy-nilly. Where once the law was respected and a rule of law or justice over it acknowledged as indispensable and objective we now have open rebellion, relativism and draconian laws that can make the hapless and the innocent into criminals and punish as if the minor were momentous. Decadence has wrought corruption in pretty much all areas of the society, including perhaps, some military personnel.

      It is not difficult or unusual to persecute our men at arms. It may be that even some of their officers have indulged themselves. From Afghanistan (per NPR) comes the story of the, apparently, self-indulgent commander who, despite numerous protests, and viable options that would have led to victory, deliberately ordered his men to execute a tactic most likely to get them killed and maimed for no discernable reason but that he wanted them to. And it did. I once had the honor of making the acquaintance of a Marine gunnery sergeant who despite his fidelity to country and duty was betrayed by his country and his service for doing his duty in Beirut. My neighbor of years ago was a man of Duty, Honor and Country for what must have approached four decades, had led his men over the bloody beaches of Normandy and finally, for all his achievements and devotion, retired as a Major. This while the historical record tells us one highly lauded officer, who never went near those beaches, repeatedly defied the supreme commander’s explicit orders and put that war effort at dire risk for no good reason. He did as he pleased. Thousands upon thousands of men might have perished for his self-indulgence.

      Now that paragraph should not be taken as an indictment of the services. It is because of their members’ honorable dedication to guarding our national security that it is written. The honorable and dishonorable ought not to be mixed. When individuals make themselves available to spend their lives to the death if necessary, integrity becomes a sacred trust. When that trust is violated to satisfy someone’s fancy or politics or as an expression of cruelty or control the violator becomes, at best, a scheming bully with rank; at worst a murderous traitor. Neither should be tolerated.

     

      The state, at its best, is an integral and accountable part of society under the higher law of justice; two parts of the same whole that secure a liberty Edmund Burke defines like this: “It is not solitary, unconnected, individual, selfish liberty, as if every man was to regulate the whole of his conduct by his own will. The liberty I mean is social freedom. It is that state of things in which liberty is secured by the equality of restraint. A constitution of things in which the liberty of no one man, an no body of men, and no number of men, can find means to trespass on the liberty of any person, or any description of persons, in the society. This kind of liberty is, indeed, but another name for justice; ascertained by wise laws, and secured by well-constructed institutions.” (Letter to Charles-Jean-Francois Depont, November 1789)

      Totalitarian socialists see the state and its power as something separate to be captured for their purposes, a rise from which, in conjunction with allied cultural institutions (media and the academy), to launch their assaults. And they have; and they do. Good and bad, the just and unjust, are determined by the party that rules the heights.  

      Conservatives understand truth as something external, to be discovered and understood, not pulled out of a hat; society’s institutions as the result of long experience; and man as forever less than perfectly virtuous. But totalitarians, like the Jacobins of the past, disdaining even hating the intricacies of society that make us a people, would have us ignore the danger of man’s ungoverned passions and put our confidence in his deceptive goodness, they claim human perfectibility given the right political circumstances, which they, having seen the light of reason, are uniquely qualified to engineer (why the rest of us have not seen this light they do not say). In this way, they poison the deep wells of wisdom and experience from which we draw with their adolescent itches.

      Politics in a capable statesman’s hands can, by starting from a deep appreciation of the society and its institutions, improve, when need arises, by a wise prudence in moderate increments; preserving that which has proved itself of benefit to the people’s freedom, security, unity, order, and prosperity; in a word their happiness. Such a society’s habits and liberties are secured by its traditions which bring order and stability, a cohering, unifying pride in its accomplishments and a justified hope for the future. And gratitude that what is enjoyed today was acquired at great effort, diligently guarded, and improved as necessary so to be passed on as a beneficent inheritance. Thus the future is approached with humility when applying the lessons of experience to the exigencies of the present. (The last four paragraphs are attributable, mostly, to Edmund Burke)

      Yet for the left politics becomes the means to make, our institutions and society, over. So freedom takes a knee to the lefts coercion, the Constitution becomes a mouthpiece for progressivism, schools become places that hold title to and indoctrinate our children, and some institutions are given license to monitor us for various reasons, and even take our information, even our smallest children’s, as their property (Michelle Malkin, Look Who’s Data Mining Your Toddlers, 10/10/2014). The polity that once left people to make their choices for themselves now insists that was a bad idea and totalitarians will do it for us. 

     

      There has, this political season, been much ado made of a narcissistic juvenile twit that runs to cad, a creepy clown, honking his horn to get attention. And of his popularity it has often been asked, how can this be? The man has made himself a political whore on the auction block of interest, and found his way to the Republican Party by the direction of his soul mate smiling Bill who, as has been written before, would come scratching at our door, boy scout in hand, and require us to call this normal. But in spite of his grotesque shortcomings this flouncing funnyman provides a hint of what people want from a leader. And that is Action on issues they believe to be pressing. The clown has honked his horn and said with great gusto and plenty of spittle and unfortunate splatter, he will do this and that, and whatever it takes to accomplish this and that. So his allure may be the result of peoples longing for the political class to take a principled stand and do something. However, this requires political skill and that disqualifies clowns.

      Silence is golden?  Not where governance and sorting through candidates is concerned. Republicans are facing a stampeding herd of hopefuls for the highest office in the land. And why shouldn’t they all run? It’s a great job, full of perks, and there are plenty of folks to do the real work; plenty of nap time, a little astrology, it’s all good, right? If you are some sensitive soul who just wants to make everybody smile and at the same time indulge a well-concealed destructive streak by contentedly following along in the footsteps of democrats, though at a slower pace (we call those moderates), you will have powerful interests supporting you. After all, to run one need only bring lots of cash and name recognition, hire the best marketing people—you are now a commodity—and sell yourself. And remember to keep track of who owns you.

     Yet for we humble voters, it is not that easy. We want our leaders to be skilled and motivated to do their jobs, to have principles and integrity, good judgment and discernment, equanimity and self-confidence, patience and humility, to be prudent and sensible, industrious and studious. And when those hungry interests would make us into a national corpse, we want our leaders to be guided by more than appetite we want them to have some guts. When ROTC cadets in full uniforms are pressured by feminist terrorists to march about in red high heels we would like our leaders to say, enough! (Mona Charen, What the Left and Right Don’t Get…, 8/31/2015.) When government leaders are assaulted by false charges, laid by gay subversives in the Democratic party (e.g., Rick Perry), and some in the Republican party, when government (and some businesses) intrudes into our lives and our institutions, seemingly, at every turn, because of some foolish premise—that is nothing but an excuse for the expansion of its meddling—that no one can get through a day without its “friendly guidance and help,” when the economy and the law seems to increasingly favor those with undue influence over government, when so many of our leaders, who would be, turn out to be insipid molly’s that best illustrate fear, mediocrity, venality, ignorance and a propensity to run and hide when challenges arise (temperance will now bring an end to this list) and when multitudinous terror groups have more influence than the electorate, citizens might reasonably wonder at the magnitude of the pretense that says we are Free.

     

      You once said, “you didn’t build that.” For the record, that sir is a lie, and the implied corollary to it, “you can’t do that” another lie that would have us surrender to the helping hands of ever bigger government and its crony’s.  

      Now my dear man, I have surely upset your delicate constitution. To this I can only say, tough.

I have the honor to be, 
an independent conservative

LYNN SWARTOS

Missoula, Montana

This letter was emended 1/20/2016. In the third paragraph from the end Rick Perry's name should have followed the Democratic Party instead of the Republican Party.


Gmail will no longer allow me to send group emails. Therefore, one individual from each state assemblie and senate etc. will be emailed this letter. Those that will still accept them. The President will receive a copy in the mail.

August 16, 2014

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

Washington, D.C., 20500

Dude:

You need to grow up, you have treated my  

notes like trifling motes, you’re so contrary.

This leaves us in thrall to those not our pals

leaving off hope of laws sanctuary.

Thus we are left to tough it out and leaves

no doubt of your drooping flaccidity.

But time in the shower might renew your

power, get a grip with alacrity.

Take your problem in hand, strike up the band

Barry’s back with a hand full of lotion.

Head for nirvana, you know you wanna

and Barry: it is all in the motion.

Then there’s Hillary whose been caught on tape

celebrating the rape of a young girl.

The kid’s bloody underwear left her giddy

but the rest of us just wanted to hurl.

Bill and Hillary share an appetite

that delights in their perverted desires,

so children aren’t safe not the merest waif.

Off to jail with you two, time to retire.

And good old Harry and Bob’s truncated

lack won’t do in the sack, what frustration!

So now it’s their lot to be focused on

tots either that or more masturbation.

They claim they were born this way and thus the

babes must pay for their ill fascination.

This leaves one at a loss and more than a

bit cross at this sick raciocination.

Perhaps you agree and would like your own

baby to have and to hold and you know.

Your secrets out Barry, there’s not a doubt

that you’re a flaccidly progressive ho.

Lynn Swartos, Montana

This letter was revised 8/17/2015 & 8/18/2015

July 31, 2015

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

Washington D.C. 20500

My dearest Barry,

       As you know, feminists, while reliable in voting for the party of flaccidly obese big government, (Republican moderates need not pat themselves on the back, experience has shown they are little better), are, like many political supplicants of its sickly wisdom, its arbitrary force that denies liberty, and its immiserating largesse, inveterate liars who have, in their own interests, socially constructed a world of subjective self-delusion in which they belligerently demand the rest of us reside. Experience has shown many happy to do this, many happy to build their share of it.

       But assent requires we reject objective values, and for those who do the end must come in surrendering to  sic volo sic jubeo, a simple I want, devoid of any claim to a motive for good 1; and this falsified reality cannot be exposed by argument, for it is not tolerated. Hence, “there is no essential difference between men and women, and the corollary that men and women are not real beings but arbitrary ‘social constructions’ containing nothing ‘natural’ or permanent” obtains. On this view man was made to be an artifact. (The emphasis is mine. Harvey Mansfield, Feminism and Its Discontents, 6/30/2014, Web)

       All this mischief has its acolytes scrambling for an illusory moral high ground while wailing their priggish fulminations and (can we believe?) remaining unaware of their own ignorance, while their targets suffer in a state of disgust and sometimes danger. So, to get to the point of this missive, I am weary of their viciousness and their masturbatory juvenile rants such as their distorted and sometimes arrant fictional claims of harm, and their groundless beliefs that can turn into vituperative accusations with harm to follow. In sum, they make me sick.

So he sent the word to slay

And slew the little childer.

—TRADITIONAL CAROL

       Bill and Hillary Clinton are two such masters of sanctimonious dissimulation. Always ready to pretend the part of the high-minded, they are in fact two slavering veterans of the gutter who take their natural pleasure in the hideous.

       For Hillary children are a tool to be used to further her ambition. If votes are to be had by aborting children Hillary is for it. If a majority can be found for the vivisection of these months old unborn human beings so that the ghouls may harvest their organs for profit she will support it. If a man wants to help gang rape a child Hillary will take her pleasure in securing his exoneration. Further, having been a laggard in supporting gay “marriage” (despite the fact she’s gay) to instead support her career, over the last few years she has, following the polls, gotten behind it. Charging forward as she has put it. It is all relative for Hillary.

       And smiling Bill, with his natal cleft fixation and aversion to his uxorial duties, as has been formerly written in the letter of 2/5/2013, wants to be free to do as he will, and he expects us to acquiesce when he does—he will be equal no matter what. In Bill’s world his propositions are always a right and normal. Bill can kill, Bill can grope, Bill can torture, Bill can take children, like Hillary, and make of them a succulent banquet for the appetites, blow jobs for all might be Bill’s next campaign slogan, and for the disfavored he will use all his power to make sure their children are available to take him and his kind inside them. (Boys and girls line up, the gay masters have something for you.) And if anyone objects all the machinery of big government will be employed to protect the pimps. Billory is supreme, wallowing their way through the misery of their victims, reigning as two blood drenched gay monarchs, thundering hate and ready to hurl gay legions at their enemies. And always watching, watching and taking their pleasure.

       Pleasure may be a just criterion for those who recognize no evil, but it fails the objectivist. Evil is real and Bill and Hillary are evil.

Here are two excerpted paragraphs from a not quite finished letter called NOTHI SEAUTON that fit the context.

       There are rumors, rumors of an American genocide, an ideological cleansing perhaps, but our upstanding government wouldn’t scamper meekly after a principle of criminal homicide, they wouldn’t allow the murder of innocent people, often just for the fun of it. Certainly the sale of humans, even transnational sales, wouldn’t be tolerated, would it? Nor would they allow the pimps that inhabit so many of our institutions to determine people’s attitudes and choices, or would they? But—well—wait a minute, maybe we should think again.  Human beings make good currency, they’re spendable, and for some people practicing the violent destruction of people is a good time, it can be positively exhilarating to take a person by the hand and progressively tear their mind apart, reel them in one progressive affirmation after another, turn them into a blubbering blob while their soul quietly screams for a redemption that never comes and ends in a hellish sanctification to obscenity that will require them to accept, with not the slightest whimper of conscience, their debauchment, because of course that moral sense no longer exists, the human has been extinguished as it must be for the training to be successful. Need someone to put on a sex show with your dog? Call now for great rates; Freedom anyone? In spite of all the posturing when it comes to courage our great leaders, like their avoirdaupois, are squishy (no bare chested promenading for the camera, please). Solipsistic snots plotting their dolce vita’s rather than the nations success is more like it; running around with their hands out telling people what they want to hear and occasionally trying to remember who they’ve sold themselves to and how many children that comes to is plausible. You start to believe all those people in government celebrating “pride” are just a bunch of sex crazed weirdo’s who covet our attention and pretend to be human. Judging by the debt raping the nation seems to be their style; rape as a leisure activity may not be that far off. There are rumors. One begins to think darkened caves suit them.

       It is now possible to go strolling through a library and see sex acts performed without a cover charge, not because you want to but because people who breath shallowly are glued to computer screens that are in public view, or you may run into graphic pornography at the printer, some febrile fellow having forgotten it in his haste to exercise his “right to privacy.” This is the world of radical individual liberty that insists on personal gratification without restraint irrespective of the consequences for others, and is supported by an equally radical egalitarianism that will not tolerate any notion of superiority in moral views—it’s all good or else. In spite of contradicting human edification and flourishing it has therefore been said on at least one major network by one prominent news reader (both shall remain anonymous) that prostitution and drugs should all be on the market. Very well then, but before that unsubstantiated proposition is further endorsed, contrary as it is to the humane, some research is in order. This would be best done by the advocate since people of sound mind would find the activity nauseating. First, you must exclude yourself from the marketplace of legitimate employment and satiate yourself with drugs; this will be necessary for the rest of the research. Then go out and practice what you preach, find yourself a nice street corner or go to some parties and get yourself passed around like a party favor; either way, line those men up and have a gay old time. Now, if you object that you are not gay that’s irrelevant, sometimes those spunky guys (and gals) find that quite arousing—the customer’s always right—and remember  a woman is not normally inclined to this activity either, it will, in fact, devastate her psychologically. But after all, a penis in the act is rather anonymous so close your eyes and follow the example you would have others set you fearless advocate; assume the teleological position of everybody else’s happiness; get used to it while you observe the self-medicated demise of your assumed humanity. (Not to fear, cash is the new dope and you’ll be loaded, just be sure to show up. Enjoy your addiction.) Then comes the evaluation, and perhaps your family if they haven’t already declined your affections could help you with this, you might tell them about your experiences, your children might even want to bring you to career day, you could show them the video’s on the internet demonstrate technique, ask for feedback. It could prove interesting, you might be inspired to move to Amsterdam, grab a window and set up shop, make it a family business. Then you could reevaluate. Finem respice

Having now sent these last two paragraphs I would like to hear no more of selfishly discontented feminists from our national police.

I HAVE THE HONOR TO BE

LYNN SWARTOS

Eau Claire, Wisconsin

1. C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man, third chapter.

As usual, someone please give Barry a copy of this.