Tuesday, January 8, 2013

December 6, 2012

The President of the United States
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President,

All these long months the lineaments of my family’s infelicity have been patiently and with great labor set before you with pitiful words. You have answered us pitilessly your silence, louder than words, conveying your haughty contempt for the innocence of my family. Congruent with your aversion to reason or prove, evidence and expostulations have failed to move you. You have impeached yourself.

We claim title to the protection of the law; you give glad consent to the grunting weight of brutality, subverting the law in furtherance of my family’s destruction.

We seek the succor of our faiths offspring, practical reason; you would, by force of law and regardless of established law, baptize us in relativism.

We support the public good; you cling to the cover of darkness wherein “the standard of justice depends on the power to coerce, the strong do what they have the power to do and the weak accept what they are forced to accept.”1

It is true that we possess no power or device that can force government—state or national—to employ the legitimate instruments of Constitution and statute to determine this dispute. However, the tenure of your office is good behavior and the consent of the people. From the latter you are now immune to direct action; of the former your malfeasance, and thus your political demise, is certain.

Government has delegitimized itself, its various members having done violence to the law and society. These are not charges without substance. Instances follow:

First, certain groups and individuals are virtually exempt from the correction of law. These include government and private terrorists alike who, purposely unacknowledged by law enforcement and armed with various government technologies (guns are now largely passé), murder rape and torture Americans with impunity. Moreover, they have created a sexual economy in which even the very youngest children are the currency.

Second, the Supreme Court, unchallenged, acting as supreme legislature, has re-written then passed an act of Congress at the bench.

Third, for weeks following the debacle in Benghazi the position and person of secretary of state seemed to disappear from the media consciousness. It is supposed this was brought about by an illegitimate force that has either cowed the media or makes them complicit.

We have come a great distance from our lovely republicanism, its friends now few those who would with great patience distort it, many. However, “There are progressions in which the last step is sui generis—incommensurable with the others—and in which to go the whole way is to undo all the labor of your previous journey.”2 We now appear to be in the latter stage of such a step. Many American leaders have, Fabian like, corrupted over a period of many decades, the United States principles of republicanism. Thus the illegitimate government disposition of tyranny's arbitrary power results in the bludgeoning of our society into conformity with its edicts. The effects are all around us. James Madison offers a thoughtful assessment, "Where an excess of power prevails, property of no sort is duly respected. No man is safe in his opinions, his person, his faculties, or his possessions."3 He goes on to say that "Where there is an excess of liberty, the effect is the same, tho' from an opposite cause."4

Can the veil of mystery that shrouds government be lifted? If so can the perversion that "make[s] power the primary and central object of the social system and liberty but its satellite"5 be rectified? And faced with liberty "abused to licentiousness"6 will we the people have the will to restore it? "[T]he pessimism of the intellect tells us Gomorrah is our probable destination. What is left to us is a determination not to accept that fate and the courage to resist it--the optimism of the will."7

You will see that a diaper list and adult diapers have been included with this letter. Given the incontinent inclination of our government quislings it seemed appropriate. Wear yours well.

Yours Truly,


Lynn Swartos
535 Ryman
Missoula, MT 59802
406-694-3475

Cc: Australian Ambassador Kim Beasley
Austrian Ambassador Dr. Hans Peter Manz
Belgium Ambassador Jan Matthysen
Brazilian Ambassador Mauro Vieira
British Ambassador Sir Peter Westmacott
Canadian Ambassador Gary Doer
Chinese Ambassador Zhang Yesui
Danish Ambassador Peter Taksoe-Jensen
Finnish Ambassador Ritva Koukku-Ronde
French Ambassador Francois Delattre
German Ambassador Peter Ammon
Irish Ambassador Michael Collins
Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren
Japanese Ambassador Ichiro Fujisaki
Mexican Ambassador Arturo Sarukhan
Norwegian Ambassador Wegger Strommen
Polish Ambassador Robert Kupiecki
Russian Ambassador Sergey I. Kislyak
South Korean Ambassador Han Duk-soo
Swedish Ambassador Jonas Hafstrom
Swiss Ambassador Manuel Sager
Chief Representative of the Republic of China Jason Yuan
Vietnamese Ambassador Nguyen Quoc Cuong

Atlanta Journal Constitution
Billings Gazette
Dallas Morning News
Denny Rehberg
Denver Post
George Will
Houston Chronicle
Missoulian
New York Post
New York Times
Philadelphia Enquirer
Wall Street Journal
Washington Post

Diaper List:
Barack Obama
Joe Biden
George W. Bush
Dick Cheney
Bill Clinton
George H.W. Bush
Robert Mueller
Louis Freeh
William Sessions
Eric Holder
Michael Mukasey
Alberto Gonzalez
John Ashcroft
Janet Reno
William Barr
Richard Thornburgh
Ed Meese

1.      Thucydides: The Peloponnesian War, Book III, Chapter 17.
2.      Abolition of Man. C.S. Lewis. 1943, Chapter 3.
3.      Writings. James Madison. Edited by Jack Rakove. New York: Library of America, 1999, p. 515
4.      Ibid., p. 515
5.      Ibid., p. 533
6.      Circular to the States. George Washington. `1783
7.      Slouching Towards Gomorrah: modern liberalism and American decline. Robert Bork.  ReaganBooks. New York, NY, 1996, p. 343.
8.      Writings. James Madison. Edited by Jack Rakove. New York: Library of America, 1999, p. 517

                                                   The Union: Who are its real friends?

Not those who charge others with not being its friends, whilst their own conduct is wantonly multiplying its enemies.

Not those who favor measures, which by pampering the spirit of speculation within and without government, disgust the best friends of the Union.

Not those who promote unnecessary accumulations of debt of the Union, instead of the best means of discharging it as fast as possible; thereby encreasing the causes of corruption in the government, and the pretexts for new taxes under its authority, the former undermining the confidence, the latter alienating the affections of the people.

Not those who avow or betray principles of monarchy and aristocracy, in opposition to the republican principles of the Union, and the republican spirit of the people; or who espouse a system of measures more accommodated to the depraved examples or those hereditary forms, than to the true genius of our own.

Not those in a word, who would force on the people the melancholy duty of chusing between the loss of the Union, and the loss of what the Union was meant to secure.
                                          The real Friends to the Union are those,
Who are friends to the authority of the people, the sole foundation on which the Union rests.

Who are friends to liberty, the great end, for which the Union was formed.

Who are friends to the limited republican system of government, the means provided by that authority, for the attainment of that end.

Who are enemies to every public measure that might smooth the way to hereditary government; for resisting the tyrannies of which the Union was first planned, and for more effectually excluding which, it was put into its present form.

Who considering a public debt as injurious to the interests of the people, and baneful to the virtue of the government, are enemies to every contrivance for unnecessarily increasing it amount, or protracting its duration, or extending its influence.

In a word, those are the real friends to the Union, who are friends to the republican policy throughout, which is the only cement for the Union of a Republican people; in opposition to a spirit of usurpation and monarchy, which is the menstruum most capable of dissolving it.
 
                                                                                      James Madison, National Gazette, April 2, 1792

           

                                                                             

 









 

No comments:

Post a Comment